Slogans are for people who need to be told what to think.
It has been probably over 5 years, since I began to pay closer attention what is happening to so-called "climate science" (actually, different scientific fields dealing with different aspects of climate, as well as anthropogenic global warming hypothesis). I've noticed very quickly that there is so much talk about the models, models being compared to other models, and inexplicably, everyone is ignoring two undisputable facts: (1) the predictions of those models are often not (if at all) in agreement with observed reality (where is the empirical validity for those models???), and (2) a lot of those models are using same input, meaning if input is flawed, all models are wrong - regardless of their algorithm. Moreover, the input - data models use - is very often collected by different people than those who model data, so it is also unclear whether there is understanding of flaws of data collection during data computation.
Richard P. Feynman, a Nobel Prize holder for his work in quantum electrodynamics, said it best: "First you guess...Then you compute the consequences. Compare the consequences to experience. If it disagrees with experience, the guess is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t matter how beautiful your guess is or how smart you are or what your name is. - If it disagrees with experience, it’s wrong."
Well, apparently, UCL scientists learnt nothing from Richard Feynman. In their recent publication addressing modeling of contact-tracing, they actually wrote opposite!!! "...we believe in checking models against each other, as it’s the best way to understand which models work best in what circumstances..."
Fortunately for all of us, this incredulous statement has (finally) raised some eyebrows - and I'm quite enjoying it.
If you are having time or interested in step-by-step analysis of this magnifique UCL's publication, follow link below. The author of the article has done wonderful job.
https://lockdownsceptics.org/new-ucl-paper-on-contact-tracing-gulls-credulous-journalist/
This was a very late recording contrasting two news articles about Omicron - so called "Covid super-strain".
I know I haven't been around lately...work...life...However, the 12-years-old clip popped into my feed and I wanted to share it. The reason? This clip provides the great basic understanding into what are the issues with so-called "evidence" related to anthropogenic (human-induced) climate change and the lack of logic when it comes to the interpretation of such evidence. The sad reality is that even after 12 years from this clip, we are still forced to endure nonsensical conclusions that hurricanes hitting Florida are caused by big bad climate change.
The mainstream media is doubling down on the alarmism, and it is not hard to guess why. However, to be fair, consider my little observation an educated guess, an opinion, rather than the fact. Time will show whether I am right.
(1) 'Climate change affects everyone': Europe battles wildfires in intense heat by Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/spain-portugal-battle-wildfires-heatwaves-scorch-southern-europe-2022-07-17/)
If you spent time in Southern Europe, Mediterranean, during summer season - July and August in particular - you probably know that heat-induced wildfires are nothing new. In fact, they are quite common and remarkably devastating for the affected communities, and I have witnessed several in person. Most of the time, the wildfires occur due to heat igniting grasses, especially in the areas where there are broken glass or broken bottles. The glass serves as an amplifier for the sun rays, especially, in the vicinity of dry grasses, or even dry pine needles, and as ...
